Military personnel dating
” More from the Army Times: “Scammers find American soldiers an effective cover because their images engender a trust and respect that can blind a person to other suspicious behavior, particularly if the victim is vulnerable and looking for love.‘A lot of people want to bend over backward to support troops, and there’s that mystique about a man in uniform that some ladies like,” Grisham said.One scam involves individuals using these social networking sites to contact relatives of deployed U. military personnel, most specifically grandparents. The impostor advises the grandparents that he is returning home on leave from Iraq and asks the grandparents to keep his presence secret so he can surprise his parents.A short time later, the grandparents are again contacted and the impostor advises them that he and a friend are stranded with a broken down car.Stolen US Military IDs Ideal Cover for Army of Online Dating Scammers Fraudsters use stolen military IDs, online dating services to steal money By Michael Cooney, Layer 8, Tue, 02/15/11 – pm It’s a new twist on an old scam. Grisham, who uses his blog, “A Soldier’s Perspective,” to expose scammers using the soldier dating con] said the scam is a new twist on the so-called Nigerian 419 advance fee scam, and its popularity is growing, fueled by soldiers’ routine use of social networking sites and the Internet’s penetration into third-world havens for con men.The Army Times newspaper today details the growing trend of fraudsters stealing the identities of US Army soldiers from social network sites and then using that information to set up false profiles on Internet dating sites. ‘In the past year, the traffic on my site related to the scams I write about has tripled,’ Grisham said.The standard for what constitutes an inappropriate leader-subordinate relationship hasn't changed in the new AR 600-20 4-14b which states, relationships, (both opposite-gender and same-gender) are prohibited if they: -- Compromise, or appear to compromise, the integrity of supervisory authority or the chain of command; -- Cause actual or perceived partiality or unfairness; -- Involve, or appear to involve, the improper use of rank or position for personal gain; -- Are, or are perceived to be, exploitative or coercive in nature; -- Create an actual or clearly predictable adverse impact on discipline, authority, morale or the ability of the command to accomplish its mission.If any of these criteria are met, the parties involved may be subject to Uniformed Code of Military Justice action under Article 92 as a violation of a lawful general regulation.
Recruiters and permanent party personnel assigned or attached to the U. Army Recruiting Command or National Guard recruiting program are also prohibited from establishing personal relationships with potential prospects, applicants, members of the Delayed Entry Program or members of the Delayed Training Program not required by the recruiting mission is prohibited The intent of the existing regulation and the changes is to ensure good order and discipline throughout the force by limiting or prohibiting relationships between leaders and subordinates, which could damage the fabric of unit cohesion.None of these relationships require any element of a sexual nature; they simply have to cause an actual or perceived situation, which negatively impacts a unit's good order and discipline.A couple of scenarios to consider are: --You are an officer who regularly hangs out with some of your subordinates to watch the game.And according to a new report, assuming the identity of US military officers based overseas are, for many scammers, the perfect cover — with photos usually readily available on the Internet, and brave, adventurous-sounding tales that seem to have enduring appeal when targeting single women.‘They’re very clever at getting under your skin…seeing what makes you tick and working on human emotion,’ said Bernard Herdan of Britain’s National Fraud Authority.Any relationship between Soldiers of different ranks, which is too personal in nature, will cause problems in a unit -- it's simply a matter of time.This is why the Army expressly prohibits relationships that meet any of the five criteria.-- Dating, shared living accommodations other than those directed by operational requirements, and intimate or sexual relationships. That same paragraph also addresses when prohibitions on personal/intimate relationships between officers and enlisted Soldiers or NCOs and junior enlisted Soldiers do not apply.Commanders should provide leadership and guidance to NCOs and junior enlisted Soldiers who are in violation of this time honored but previously unwritten policy.The Army also prohibits relationships between certain categories of Soldiers, regardless of any command or unit affiliation.Previously, certain types of personal relationships between officers and enlisted personnel were prohibited in writing, while long standing military tradition proscribed personal relationships between NCOs and junior enlisted personnel.